turn 0384.0s turn · 67.4s LLM · 316.5s tools · tokens in=1,079 · out=5,375 · total=6,454 · FINAL · reasoning clipped
reasoning
reasoning (truncated 3264 chars): Let me analyze the task:
1. We have a three-stage MLP with dimensions:
- Input: B=16, H0=48
- After W1: H1=64
- After W2: H2=40
- After W3 (output): H3=24
2. The forward pass is:
- h1 = relu(h0 @ W1)
- h2 = relu(h1 @ W2)
- out = h2 @ W3
3. All linear layers have no bias.
4. We need to create a custom CUDA kernel that fuses these operations for better performance.
The key insight here is that we can fuse multiple operations together:
- Matrix multiplication followed by ReLU can be fused
- The entire three-stage MLP can potentially be computed in one kernel or fused stages
Let me think about the best approach:
Option 1: Fuse all three stages into one kernel
- This would require loading weights and computing in a tiled manner
- Might have shared memory limitations
Option 2: Fuse ReLU with each matmul, do three separate kernels
- h1 = fused_matmul_relu(h0, W1)
- h2 = fused_matmul_relu(h1, W2)
- out = matmul(h2, W3)
Option 3: Use a more optimized approach with block-wise computation
Given the sizes are relatively small (B=16, features up to 64), I should consider:
- The matrices are small enough that we might benefit from keeping intermediate results in registers/shared memory
- We could potentially compute all three stages without writing intermediates to global memory
Let me design a kernel that:
1. For each output element (batch, H3), computes the entire pipeline
2. Uses shared memory for intermediate activations
Actually, let me think more carefully about the dimensions:
- h0: [16, 48]
- W1: [48, 64]
- h1: [16, 64]
- W2: [64, 40]
- h2: [16, 40]
- W3: [40, 24]
- out: [16, 24]
The computational flow shows a progressive reduction and expansion of feature dimensions. I'll need to carefully manage memory access patterns and leverage shared memory to minimize global memory transfers. The small batch size suggests potential for kernel optimization through efficient thread mapping and memory reuse.
A fused kernel approach looks promising, targeting output element computation with shared memory optimizations. The strategy involves collaborative thread block processing, strategically staged matrix multiplication, and minimal global memory interactions.
I'll focus on a single kernel design that progressively computes layer transformations while maintaining computational efficiency through shared memory management. The approach aims to minimize memory transfers and maximize parallel computation across thread blocks.
The core implementation will involve carefully staged computations: loading weights, performing layer transformations, and writing final results with an emphasis on thread cooperation and shared memory utilization.
Preliminary analysis suggests significant performance potential by keeping intermediate computations in fast on-chip memory and reducing global memory access overhead.
The kernel will strategically compute ReLU-activated matrix multiplications across multiple layers, optimizing for the specific network dimensions of [16, 48] -> [16, 24].
Shared memory constraints require careful design. I'll create a fused matrix multiplication kernel with configurable block sizes, ensuring efficient thread utilization and memory access patterns. The implementation will leverage CUDA's parallel processing capabilities for neural network layer computations.
I'll start the partial implementation, focusing on the kernel signature and initialization strategy for thread and block configurations.
The kernel handles matrix multiplication for the first weight matrix, with threads cooperatively loading input and weight data into shared memory. Each thread computes partial products across tile dimensions, efficiently utilizing GPU parallel processing capabilities.
Threads compute dot products by iterating through tile blocks, loading input and weight values into shared memory arrays. The computation uses ReLU activation, storing intermediate results for subsequent processing stages.
The method synchronizes threads to ensure consistent shared memory access during the tiled matrix multiplication approach. I'll compute the output by loading weights into shared memory, then performing matrix multiplication with ReLU activation. Each thread processes a specific output element, accumulating the product and applying non-linearity. Finally, the result is stored in the output matrix, leveraging parallel computation across the batch and output dimensions.
The kernel is launched with a grid and block configuration tailored to the matrix dimensions, ensuring efficient GPU utilization for the linear transformation.
I'm now considering a more optimized approach that fuses multiple operations, particularly for small batch scenarios, potentially improving computational efficiency.
The key observation is the dimensional reduction and expansion happening across linear transformations, suggesting a strategic kernel design that minimizes data movement and maximizes parallel computation.
I'll focus on creating a fused kernel that can efficiently handle the multi-layer perceptron transformations while keeping intermediate results compact and computationally streamlined.
The strategy involves carefully mapping thread blocks to leverage shared memory and minimize redundant memory transfers, potentially reducing computational overhead for these small-batch neural network operations.
By consolidating the three matrix multiplications into a single kernel launch, we can significantly optimize memory access patterns and reduce kernel launch overhead.
The approach requires precise shared memory allocation and thread block synchronization to ensure accurate layer-wise transformations across the network's computational graph.
I'll focus on creating an efficient kernel that maximizes computational throughput while minimizing memory transfers between GPU global and shared memory spaces.
The kernel will leverage cooperative thread loading, shared memory tiling, and efficient matrix multiplication strategies to optimize performance across multiple network layers.
Each thread processes a tile of input and weight matrices, computing partial results using shared memory to reduce global memory access overhead. The computation accumulates values across tile dimensions, enabling high-performance neural network layer transformations.
After completing the first layer's computation, threads synchronize to prepare shared memory for subsequent layer processing, loading intermediate results efficiently.
The code carefully manages thread-level parallelism, ensuring each thread contributes to the overall matrix multiplication while maintaining precise memory access patterns.
Threads collaborate to load matrix tiles into shared memory, enabling efficient computation across matrix dimensions. The synchronization points ensure coordinated access to shared memory resources during the matrix multiplication process.
The computation accumulates partial products across thread blocks, preparing for potential activation function application and further processing. I'll compute the final layer's matrix multiplication, loading weights into shared memory and calculating the output with ReLU activation. Each thread processes a specific output element, accumulating the product and applying the activation function before storing the result.
The computation involves loading weight tiles, performing dot products across input and weight dimensions, and applying ReLU to generate the final output for each thread's assigned element.
I'll set up the CUDA extension to compile this custom kernel, defining the function to launch the kernel with appropriate grid and block dimensions for the network's layer computations.
The module will dynamically compile the CUDA code, enabling high-performance matrix multiplication with built-in ReLU activation for the neural network layers. By using inline CUDA compilation, we can create optimized compute kernels directly within the Python mo
...[ omitted 3264 characters ]...
and ensuring clean, predictable shared memory utilization.
With 32 threads per block and a H1 dimension of 64, the current approach risks incomplete data coverage. The tile-based loading mechanism needs careful recalibration to match the exact shared memory dimensions and thread allocation strategy.
The core challenge involves synchronizing thread assignments with shared memory storage, ensuring comprehensive and efficient data transfer across the computational grid. I'll need to complete the partial thought about shared memory loading and then summarize the key insights concisely.
Each thread needs to load multiple values to fully populate the shared memory tile. The current approach only loads one value, leaving half the tile uninitialized. A more efficient strategy involves each thread loading two consecutive elements, ensuring complete tile coverage with the existing thread configuration.
The optimal solution requires rethinking thread allocation and memory loading to maximize parallel efficiency while minimizing unused threads. Adjusting thread count or loading strategy can resolve the dimensional mismatch.
I'll carefully design a kernel that balances computational resources with memory access patterns, ensuring complete tile coverage across different layer dimensions.
The key optimization involves strategically launching kernels with specific grid and block configurations, leveraging shared memory and thread synchronization to efficiently compute matrix multiplications across multiple neural network layers. By using tiled approaches and precise thread indexing, we can maximize parallel computation while minimizing redundant calculations.
The kernel will systematically process input transformations through multiple weight matrices, applying ReLU activations between computational stages. I'll load the weights for the second layer, using shared memory to efficiently access the transposed weight matrix. Each thread will load its corresponding weight element, ensuring the matrix is properly oriented for the matrix multiplication. The shared memory loading pattern allows coalesced memory access and prepares the weights for the next computation stage.
Threads will load weights from the transposed matrix, mapping the global memory indices to shared memory locations. The loading ensures that the weight matrix is correctly positioned for the subsequent matrix multiplication operation.
The computation proceeds by iterating through tiles, loading input and weight values into shared memory, and then computing the dot product. Each thread accumulates its result, applying the ReLU activation function at the end of the computation.
The kernel uses a tiled approach to maximize memory bandwidth and computational efficiency, with careful synchronization between thread blocks to coordinate data loading and processing.
I'll need to adjust the kernel launch configuration and handle the tile dimensions more flexibly to match the matrix dimensions precisely.
The current approach risks out-of-bounds memory access and doesn't align perfectly with the matrix shapes. I'll redesign the kernel to handle the full dimensions without tiling, ensuring each thread processes the correct matrix elements safely.
A straightforward implementation will compute the entire matrix multiplication directly, avoiding complex tiling logic and potential boundary issues. I'll load weights into shared memory, using a tiled approach for the matrix multiplication. Each thread will compute partial dot products across tiles, accumulating results in registers. The kernel synchronizes threads after loading shared memory to ensure all data is available before computation begins.
Threads calculate output elements by iterating through tiles, loading weight and input matrix segments cooperatively into shared memory. The computation multiplies corresponding elements from input and weight tiles, storing partial results in a running sum.
Boundary checks prevent out-of-bounds memory access, ensuring only valid threads participate in computation. The final result applies ReLU activation before writing to the output matrix.
I recognize potential optimization opportunities for matrix multiplication, considering specialized libraries like cuBLAS. However, the current approach focuses on fusing operations within a single kernel, prioritizing end-to-end performance over micro-optimizations.
The strategy involves creating separate fused kernels for ReLU activations, strategically combining multiple computational steps to minimize kernel launch overhead and improve overall processing efficiency.
I'll launch specialized kernels for each stage of the matrix multiplication, ensuring seamless integration of activation functions while maintaining computational throughput. The approach systematically processes each layer's transformation with optimized kernel configurations.
The final kernel completes the three-stage pipeline, applying the last matrix multiplication without additional activation. Each kernel strategically manages shared memory and thread synchronization to maximize computational efficiency.
The forward method prepares input tensors and launches the sequential GPU kernels, transforming the network's intermediate representations through carefully structured computational stages.
The initialization method sets up linear transformation layers, dynamically configuring weight matrices to support the neural network's architectural requirements.
I'll focus on creating an efficient implementation that leverages tiled matrix multiplication with ReLU fusion. The kernel design needs careful consideration of matrix dimensions and computational efficiency.
The approach involves developing a specialized CUDA kernel that combines matrix multiplication with activation, optimizing for performance and memory access patterns.
Key design choices include using shared memory tiles, implementing boundary checks, and ensuring threads handle out-of-bounds computations safely. The kernel will support flexible matrix dimensions while maintaining computational throughput.
Threads collaborate by loading matrix tiles into shared memory, computing partial dot products across matrix dimensions. Boundary checks prevent illegal memory access during tile loading and computation.
The approach uses block-level parallelism, with threads synchronizing to efficiently process matrix multiplication across potentially non-square matrix shapes. I'll compute the output using the fused ReLU matrix multiplication kernel, creating an output tensor with the specified dimensions. The kernel launches with a grid of blocks sized to cover the batch and output dimensions, using a fixed thread block configuration. After processing the first layer, the method appears to be preparing to continue the forward pass with subsequent layers.
The code suggests a multi-stage neural network implementation using custom CUDA kernels for efficient matrix multiplication with built-in ReLU activation. The method seems designed to handle batched input processing with optimized GPU parallel computation. I'll launch the CUDA kernels for each layer, transforming the input through the neural network. Each kernel applies a matrix multiplication followed by a ReLU activation, progressively changing the tensor dimensions. The final layer produces the output without an activation function. The method returns the transformed result after processing through three sequential linear transformations.
The initialization sets up the network's weight matrices using linear layers without biases, preparing the model for forward computation. The approach leverages custom CUDA kernels for efficient GPU-accelerated matrix operations, optimizing computational performance.
However, the small tensor sizes might limit potential performance gains from kernel fusion, suggesting the implementation may need careful performance profiling to validate the optimization strategy.
call → submit_kernel
callsubmit_kernel
{
"kernel_code": "\"\"\"\nThree-stage MLP on packed activations: h1 = relu(h0 @ W1), h2 = relu(h1 @ W2), out = h2 @ W3.\nOptimized with fused CUDA kernels for matmul + ReLU.\n\"\"\"\n\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\nfrom torch.utils.cpp_extension import load_inline\n\nfrom kernelbench.distributed_collectives import default_device\n\nB = 16\nH0 = 48\nH1 = 64\nH2 = 40\nH3 = 24\n\n\n# Compile CUDA kernels at module load time\ncuda_source = \"\"\"\n#include <cuda.h>\n#include <cuda_runtime.h>\n#include <cstdio>\n\n// Fused matrix multiplication with ReLU activation\n// Computes: output[i,j] = max(0, sum_k(input[i,k] * weight[k,j]))\n// weight is stored transposed: weight[j,k] where j is output dim, k is input dim\ntemplate<int TILE_SIZE>\n__global__ void matmul_relu_kernel(\n const float* __restrict__ input,\n const float* __restrict__ weight,\n float* __restrict__ output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim)\n{\n int i = blockIdx.x;\n int j = blockIdx.y * TILE_SIZE + threadIdx.x;\n \n if (i >= batch_size) return;\n \n float sum = 0.0f;\n \n for (int k_tile = 0; k_tile < in_dim; k_tile += TILE_SIZE) {\n __shared__ float weight_tile[TILE_SIZE * TILE_SIZE];\n __shared__ float input_tile[TILE_SIZE];\n \n // Load weight tile (transposed access for coalescing)\n int k_idx = k_tile + threadIdx.x;\n int j_idx = blockIdx.y * TILE_SIZE + threadIdx.y;\n if (k_idx < in_dim && j_idx < out_dim) {\n weight_tile[threadIdx.y * TILE_SIZE + threadIdx.x] = weight[j_idx * in_dim + k_idx];\n }\n \n // Load input tile\n if (threadIdx.y == 0 && k_idx < in_dim) {\n input_tile[threadIdx.x] = input[i * in_dim + k_idx];\n }\n \n __syncthreads();\n \n // Compute partial dot product\n int k_limit = min(TILE_SIZE, in_dim - k_tile);\n for (int k = 0; k < k_limit; k++) {\n int j_local = threadIdx.x;\n if (j < out_dim) {\n sum += input_tile[k] * weight_tile[j_local * TILE_SIZE + k];\n }\n }\n \n __syncthreads();\n }\n \n // Apply ReLU and store result\n if (j < out_dim) {\n output[i * out_dim + j] = fmaxf(0.0f, sum);\n }\n}\n\n// Matrix multiplication without activation (for final layer)\ntemplate<int TILE_SIZE>\n__global__ void matmul_kernel(\n const float* __restrict__ input,\n const float* __restrict__ weight,\n float* __restrict__ output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim)\n{\n int i = blockIdx.x;\n int j = blockIdx.y * TILE_SIZE + threadIdx.x;\n \n if (i >= batch_size) return;\n \n float sum = 0.0f;\n \n for (int k_tile = 0; k_tile < in_dim; k_tile += TILE_SIZE) {\n __shared__ float weight_tile[TILE_SIZE * TILE_SIZE];\n __shared__ float input_tile[TILE_SIZE];\n \n int k_idx = k_tile + threadIdx.x;\n int j_idx = blockIdx.y * TILE_SIZE + threadIdx.y;\n if (k_idx < in_dim && j_idx < out_dim) {\n weight_tile[threadIdx.y * TILE_SIZE + threadIdx.x] = weight[j_idx * in_dim + k_idx];\n }\n \n if (threadIdx.y == 0 && k_idx < in_dim) {\n input_tile[threadIdx.x] = input[i * in_dim + k_idx];\n }\n \n __syncthreads();\n \n int k_limit = min(SHARED_MEM_SIZE, in_dim - k_tile);\n for (int k = 0; k < k_limit; k++) {\n int j_local = threadIdx.x;\n if (j < out_dim) {\n sum += input_tile[k] * weight_tile[j_local * TILE_SIZE + k];\n }\n }\n \n __syncthreads();\n }\n \n if (j < out_dim) {\n output[i * out_dim + j] = sum;\n }\n}\n\n// Simple non-tiled fused matmul + ReLU kernel for small matrices\n__global__ void fused_matmul_relu_simple(\n const float* __restrict__ input,\n const float* __restrict__ weight,\n float* __restrict__ output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim)\n{\n int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;\n int j = blockIdx.y * blockDim.y + threadIdx.y;\n \n if (i >= batch_size || j >= out_dim) return;\n \n float sum = 0.0f;\n for (int k = 0; k < in_dim; k++) {\n sum += input[i * in_dim + k] * weight[j * in_dim + k];\n }\n output[i * out_dim + j] = fmaxf(0.0f, sum);\n}\n\n// Simple non-tiled matmul kernel for small matrices\n__global__ void matmul_simple(\n const float* __restrict__ input,\n const float* __restrict__ weight,\n float* __restrict__ output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim)\n{\n int i = blockIdx.x * blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;\n int j = blockIdx.y * blockDim.y + threadIdx.y;\n \n if (i >= batch_size || j >= out_dim) return;\n \n float sum = 0.0f;\n for (int k = 0; k < in_dim; k++) {\n sum += input[i * in_dim + k] * weight[j * in_dim + k];\n }\n output[i * out_dim + j] = sum;\n}\n\n// Host functions\nvoid fused_matmul_relu(\n const float* input, const float* weight, float* output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim, cudaStream_t stream)\n{\n dim3 threads(16, 16);\n dim3 blocks((batch_size + 15) / 16, (out_dim + 15) / 16);\n fused_matmul_relu_simple<<<blocks, threads, 0, stream>>>(\n input, weight, output, batch_size, in_dim, out_dim);\n}\n\nvoid matmul_final(\n const float* input, const float* weight, float* output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim, cudaStream_t stream)\n{\n dim3 threads(16, 16);\n dim3 blocks((batch_size + 15) / 16, (out_dim + 15) / 16);\n matmul_simple<<<blocks, threads, 0, stream>>>(\n input, weight, output, batch_size, in_dim, out_dim);\n}\n\"\"\"\n\ncpp_source = \"\"\"\nvoid fused_matmul_relu(const float* input, const float* weight, float* output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim, cudaStream_t stream);\nvoid matmul_final(const float* input, const float* weight, float* output,\n int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim, cudaStream_t stream);\n\"\"\"\n\n# Load the CUDA extension\nmlp_cuda = load_inline(\n name='mlp_cuda',\n cpp_sources=cpp_source,\n cuda_sources=cuda_source,\n functions=['fused_matmul_relu', 'matmul_final'],\n extra_cuda_cflags=['-O3'],\n verbose=False\n)\n\n\nclass ModelNew(nn.Module):\n def __init__(self):\n super().__init__()\n self.W1 = nn.Linear(H0, H1, bias=False)\n self.W2 = nn.Linear(H1, H2, bias=False)\n self.W3 = nn.Linear(H2, H3, bias=False)\n \n def forward(self, h0: torch.Tensor) -> torch.Tensor:\n # Get weight matrices (transposed for efficient access)\n W1 = self.W1.weight # [H1, H0]\n W2 = self.W2.weight # [H2, H1]\n W3 = self.W3.weight # [H3, H2]\n \n # Ensure contiguous float32\n h0_f32 = h0.contiguous().float()\n W1_f32 = W1.contiguous().float()\n W2_f32 = W2.contiguous().float()\n W3_f32 = W3.contiguous().float()\n \n # Allocate output tensors\n h1 = torch.empty(B, H1, dtype=torch.float32, device=h0.device)\n h2 = torch.empty(B, H2, dtype=torch.float32, device=h0.device)\n out = torch.empty(B, H3, dtype=torch.float32, device=h0.device)\n \n # Stage 1: h1 = relu(h0 @ W1^T)\n mlp_cuda.fused_matmul_relu(\n h0_f32.data_ptr(), W1_f32.data_ptr(), h1.data_ptr(),\n B, H0, H1, torch.cuda.current_stream().cuda_stream\n )\n \n # Stage 2: h2 = relu(h1 @ W2^T)\n mlp_cuda.fused_matmul_relu(\n h1.data_ptr(), W2_f32.data_ptr(), h2.data_ptr(),\n B, H1, H2, torch.cuda.current_stream().cuda_stream\n )\n \n # Stage 3: out = h2 @ W3^T (no activation)\n mlp_cuda.matmul_final(\n h2.data_ptr(), W3_f32.data_ptr(), out.data_ptr(),\n B, H2, H3, torch.cuda.current_stream().cuda_stream\n )\n \n return out\n\n\ndef get_inputs():\n dev = default_device()\n g = torch.Generator(device=dev)\n g.manual_seed(14)\n return [torch.randn(B, H0, device=dev, generator=g)]\n\n\ndef get_init_inputs():\n return []"
}
result ← submit_kernel (fail)
failsubmit_kernel
submit_kernel FAILED: kernel did not compile.
Error building extension 'mlp_cuda': [1/3] /usr/local/cuda/bin/nvcc -MD -MF cuda.cuda.o.d -ccbin /opt/conda/bin/x86_64-conda-linux-gnu-cc -DTORCH_EXTENSION_NAME=mlp_cuda -DTORCH_API_INCLUDE_EXTENSION_H -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include/torch/csrc/api/include -isystem /usr/local/cuda/include -isystem /opt/conda/include/python3.10 -D__CUDA_NO_HALF_OPERATORS__ -D__CUDA_NO_HALF_CONVERSIONS__ -D__CUDA_NO_BFLOAT16_CONVERSIONS__ -D__CUDA_NO_HALF2_OPERATORS__ --expt-relaxed-constexpr -gencode=arch=compute_90,code=compute_90 -gencode=arch=compute_90,code=sm_90 --compiler-options '-fPIC' -O3 -std=c++17 -c /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/cuda.cu -o cuda.cuda.o
FAILED: [code=2] cuda.cuda.o
/usr/local/cuda/bin/nvcc -MD -MF cuda.cuda.o.d -ccbin /opt/conda/bin/x86_64-conda-linux-gnu-cc -DTORCH_EXTENSION_NAME=mlp_cuda -DTORCH_API_INCLUDE_EXTENSION_H -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include/torch/csrc/api/include -isystem /usr/local/cuda/include -isystem /opt/conda/include/python3.10 -D__CUDA_NO_HALF_OPERATORS__ -D__CUDA_NO_HALF_CONVERSIONS__ -D__CUDA_NO_BFLOAT16_CONVERSIONS__ -D__CUDA_NO_HALF2_OPERATORS__ --expt-relaxed-constexpr -gencode=arch=compute_90,code=compute_90 -gencode=arch=compute_90,code=sm_90 --compiler-options '-fPIC' -O3 -std=c++17 -c /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/cuda.cu -o cuda.cuda.o
nvcc warning : incompatible redefinition for option 'compiler-bindir', the last value of this option was used
/scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/cuda.cu(93): error: identifier "SHARED_MEM_SIZE" is undefined
int k_limit = min(SHARED_MEM_SIZE, in_dim - k_tile);
^
1 error detected in the compilation of "/scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/cuda.cu".
[2/3] /opt/conda/bin/x86_64-conda-linux-gnu-c++ -MMD -MF main.o.d -DTORCH_EXTENSION_NAME=mlp_cuda -DTORCH_API_INCLUDE_EXTENSION_H -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include/torch/csrc/api/include -isystem /usr/local/cuda/include -isystem /opt/conda/include/python3.10 -fPIC -std=c++17 -c /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/main.cpp -o main.o
FAILED: [code=1] main.o
/opt/conda/bin/x86_64-conda-linux-gnu-c++ -MMD -MF main.o.d -DTORCH_EXTENSION_NAME=mlp_cuda -DTORCH_API_INCLUDE_EXTENSION_H -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include -isystem /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/include/torch/csrc/api/include -isystem /usr/local/cuda/include -isystem /opt/conda/include/python3.10 -fPIC -std=c++17 -c /scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/main.cpp -o main.o
/scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/main.cpp:4:65: error: 'cudaStream_t' has not been declared
4 | int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim, cudaStream_t stream);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/scratch/abaner/KernelBench/runs/pop_l123_st_gpt/popcorn/FW-GLM-5-1/level_3_problem_11_cache/k_2b39fa59c44b/mlp_cuda/main.cpp:6:60: error: 'cudaStream_t' has not been declared
6 | int batch_size, int in_dim, int out_dim, cudaStream_t stream);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.